- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:19:54 -0500
- To: mikes@opera.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF6241D43C.0C0AE8C4-ON85257249.0069F8D4-85257249.006A187F@LocalDomain>
> I think in general it's a risky to make broad statements about > particular UI behavior across existing browsers, and not consider > that there might be possibly important distinctions among them. In > discussions here, I sometimes find myself wondering exactly which > browsers people have spent time looking at. I get the impression > that most folks are probably pretty familiar with MSIE and > Firefox. And maybe with Safari. But I wonder who's spent time > looking at, say, Konqueror (which is, I think, the second-most > widely used browser on Linux), or Flock or Maxthon or OmniWeb > (which are known for having some innovative features), or Amaya > (the W3C's browser/editor), or iCab, or Shiira, or Flock, or... > > I'm not saying that other browsers are necessarily doing anything > differently today with regard to display of security context > information than MSIE or Firefox are. But they may already have > some UI behavior that could shine light on ways to better display > security information. Mike, would you be willing to draft section 8, Browsers/UAs we'll look at, starting with this list (or what you know)? Mez
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 19:20:25 UTC