- From: Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:20:45 -0600
- To: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Hi Thomas, I've also moved these sections into the Goals section of the Note. See: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteGoals The second section below sounds like it might be calling content authoring tools into scope. If so, we should add an item to the In Scope section for "Content Authoring Tools". Tyler -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Roessler Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:01 AM To: beltzner@mozilla.com; public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Appropriateness; authoring and deployment techniques This is in response to ACTION-46 and ACTION-45 (both on me), and ACTION-42 (on Mike Beltzner, ties to -45, and seemingly not done yet). I've added the following text to NoteInScope: | The Working Group may consider different characteristic interaction | scenarios, and may make recommendations on the appropriatenes of the | communication of context information in the respective scenarios. | The Working Group may recommend authoring and deployment techniques | that enable sites to cause appropriate security context information to | be communicated to users. I'm pretty sure that Mike had more in mind for the second part; Mike, the lock is yours. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 17:20:58 UTC