- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:26:56 +0100
- To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/02/27 Dial-in information (member-only) [1] Zakim instructions [2] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2007Feb/0013 [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim ---------------------------------------- 1. Call setup - Scribe list: (active) SD, HL, LH, LF, RA, BNS, AS, EP, CB, TV, CP, JF, PM, CV, (inactive) JBD, JL, MK, JH, NG, TP - Any modifications to agenda? - Any other business? ---------------------------------------- 2. Approval of minutes of our last telcon - Minutes of last call [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070220 ---------------------------------------- 3. Action Item Review - Action item list [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions 2006-11-21: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work things out with the Usage Guide - pending? ---------------------------------------- 4. Administrivia - Telcon times - US changes time to DST two weeks before Europe - Mar 13 and Mar 20 telcons will be one hour later in the US - Any tutorials, articles, presentations, tools, projects, applications, demos, portals for our WG page? - Expecting TAG's response to question about moving WSDL operation safety to SAWSDL [1] ---------------------------------------- 5. Namespace change to /ns/sawsdl ? [1] - Following suit with WSDL 2.0 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Feb/0022 ---------------------------------------- 6. Implementation status - Implementation report [1] - Test suite [2] - Status of your implementations? - Two WSDL 2.0 parsers - One WSDL 1.1 parser (with attrExtensions support) - RDF mapping (expected from Jacek by end of Feb) - Specs using SAWSDL (at least 1 expected from DERI by end of Feb) [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/Overview.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite.html ---------------------------------------- 7. CR Issue 6: propagation of annotations [1] - Should the model reference and schema mapping propagation in our spec be reflected in the WSDL/XML Schema component models? - Is our interface extension model reference propagation broken? [2] - Counterexample - safe interface (only safe operations), when extended, need not stay safe - Summary of previous discussion: - WSDL doesn't say whether interface extension is inheritance or aggregation, both can be justified - Would it be useful for us to specify a restriction on this? - Some model references should propagate, others shouldn't - We probably don't want new syntax, but we can instruct (SA)WSDL authors to consider propagation of some model references manually [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/CR-20070126#x6 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Feb/0018.html ---------------------------------------- 8. Future of the Working Group - After we get to Proposed Rec, we can suggest to do further work - We'd need to formulate new charter, to be approved by the AC - Or we can suggest new WG(s), declare success and dissolve
Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 15:27:06 UTC