Re: possible adoption of safety WSDL annotation in SAWSDL

Oh, I wouldn't go so far, as I'm not sure that the action URI is really
meant as a semantic concept describing the operation. IIRC, some server
implementations put the Java class name for the soap action, same for
all operations, just to simplify routing the request to the right
objects. 
In short, as SAWSDL, I wouldn't touch SOAP action with a 10ft pole. 8-)
Best regards,
Jacek

On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 13:17 -0500, Carine Bournez wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:02:37PM +0100, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > 
> > Dear all, 
> > I recently voiced a proposal [2] in the WS-Description list that it
> > might make sense to move WSDL's operation safety annotation [1] from the
> > WSDL spec to the SAWSDL spec, with the appropriate change of syntax from
> > wsdlx:safe="true" to sawsdl:modelReference="...#SafeInteraction". The
> > question has made it to the W3C TAG [3], with support for the change
> > from Jonathan Marsh, albeit with his WS-Desc WG chair's hat off. 8-)
> 
> 
> I think it would also make sense to replace the wsoap:action "annotation"
> with a sawsdl annotation too.
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 10 February 2007 19:20:08 UTC