- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:39:39 +0200
- To: Rama Akkiraju <akkiraju@us.ibm.com>, Brahmananda Sapkota <brahmananda.sapkota@deri.org>
- Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>, SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Hi Rama, Brahmananda, I was writing an email to Jonathan to clarify the comment #4 below, because we noted that in 2.1 we don't use the XML Schema namespace and the RDF Schema namespace has a correct number of # signs in it. However, I didn't send the email because, I noticed that the document defines the prefix xs to map to http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# which is correct when used in RDF data (e.g. listings 2.2-1, 2.2-2, 2.3-1) but incorrect when used for XML Schema elements (e.g. listings 1.2-1, 1.2-2, 3.1-1). I suggest that we drop the # sign from the binding of prefix xs in 1.1, introduce a prefix xs2 or something like that with the # sign in it, and we use xs for the XML version of schema and xs2 for the RDF references. Best regards, Jacek On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:53 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > 4) We noticed an error in the example in Section 2.1 of the Usage Guide; > there is an extra # on the schema namespace. Perhaps the examples should be > validated more carefully - namely by submitting them into the WSDL test > suite ;-). Not only will that help find errors in the WSDLs, but it will > also encourage WSDL 2.0 vendors to make sure the annotations are easy to get > at in their tools.
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 13:10:59 UTC