Re: issue: externally defined semantic annotations from Jacek Kopecky on 2006-05-14 (public-ws-semann@w3.org from May 2006)

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 00:34:36 +0200
To: laurent.henocque@gmail.com
Cc: public-ws-semann@w3.org
Message-Id: <1147646076.4078.12.camel@localhost>

Laurent, 

do you have a concrete proposal about what this might mean to our
syntax?

Thanks,

Jacek

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 17:22 +0200, Laurent Henocque wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> One way of allowing at no cost externally defined semantics would be to accept sawsdl files to be redundant with an
> original wsdl spec, while abstracting of needless details.
> 
> If an sawsdl file refers to an orginal wsdl file, and provides additional (but consistent) information, the same
> language can be used to internally and externally define semantics.
> 
> Is this possible?
> 
> Laurent
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFEYLO8IF1tz5h+GDARAqx4AJ4gNoMTkDVOFXLOsHnje0qTi2RFqACfWMma
> 4KZCq288IBFIsh6kmNPuAw4=
> =PlPG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 22:34:43 UTC