- From: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:12:01 -0400
- To: Rama Akkiraju <akkiraju@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: SAWSDL WG <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Rama, I agree that we should add rigor and clarity to the resolution rules. If you have some possible suggestions, please send them along. I don't think we can eliminate the need for these rules since there are valid reasons for putting annotations at both levels. I am unaware of a way to enforce the rules. The schema will not help here and we don't have much else at our disposal. > Item: Conflict Resolution Rules (at the bottom of the section 2 in the > spec): > At the bottom of the section 2, we specify a bunch of rules to resolve > conflicts. Is there a way to formalize these rules or enforce them via the > spec? Or may be we should think about designing things in such a way that > conflicts don’t arise at all. Regards, Joel
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 20:12:13 UTC