Re: Some items for discussion from Joel Farrell on 2006-04-26 (public-ws-semann@w3.org from April 2006)

From: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:05:28 -0400
To: Rama Akkiraju <akkiraju@us.ibm.com>
Cc: SAWSDL WG <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF83DFC2E9.29C98101-ON8525715C.0005B7B0-8525715C.0005FF4F@us.ibm.com>

Hi Rama,

>
> Editorial Comment:
> Why was the example at the beginning taken out? I usually find most specs
> very reader unfriendly. An example upfront is a great way to introduce
the
> ideas. I strongly believe that we should have a full example at the
> beginning.
>
The example was moved to the appendix to conform to standard practice in
W3C specs.

> Item: Editorial Change
> Section 2.1 in the current version of the SAWSDL spec refers to ‘action’
> concept. It is actually a modelReference on the operation. So, references
> to ‘action’ should be taken out.
>

Yes, we will clean this up.

> Item: Editorial Comment
> Should we cleanup the namespaces for examples referring to ibm and lsdis
> web sites to point to more neutral namespaces.

We will.

Thanks,
Joel

Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 01:05:41 UTC