- From: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:58:29 -0400
- To: Holger Lausen <holger.lausen@deri.org>
- Cc: SAWSDL WG <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Hi Holger, We can certainly use a different example or improve this one. I think we should keep it focused on a business problem to show that semantics apply to real business integration problems. Perhaps one of the scenarios we are gathering will yield a better example. The RosettaNet example was there specifically to illustrate the concept of annotating the operation element, since the RosettaNet functions are standardized. Regards, Joel public-ws-semann-request@w3.org wrote on 04/25/2006 10:11:17 AM: > Hi, > > reading the spec more carefully I have the feeling that the RosettaNet > example (or in general the purchase order scenario) is inadequate for > the core specification documnent. > > In fact the example is only very loosely based on RosettaNet. RosettaNet > itself only distributes DTD and also the tag names seem not to match > (e.g. RosettaNet uses GTIN for prodcut identification whereas POItem.xsd > seems to use EANCode). > > However, even if we remove the explicit reference to RosettaNet, I > believe that due to the complexity of a purchase order scenario it can > hardly provide a self contained example. Therefore I would prefer a more > trivial example such as a weather forecast, which should be sufficient > to illustrate the three pointers we are about to standardize. > > best > Holger > > > -- > Holger Lausen > > Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) > http://www.deri.org/ > > Tel: +43 512 5076464 > Email: holger.lausen@deri.org > > [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Joel Farrell/Cambridge/IBM]
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 00:58:40 UTC