- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:17:37 +0200
- To: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: SAWSDL WG <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Joel, thanks a lot, the document looks good. 8-) Currently access to that space on the W3C server seems forbidden, we'll fix it soon, then the URI should be http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/spec/SAWSDL.html If you've identified other parts that you think should be removed, please raise the appropriate issues on the list, so we can fall into the routine. 8-) Also, I suggest using $Date$ in the heading of the document instead of the manually updated date, I think that will be more appropriate for the editor's copy, and less work for the editors. Thanks again, Jacek Kopecký -- Digital Enterprise Research Institute University of Innsbruck, Austria Phone: +43 512 5076481 Org: http://www.deri.org/ Blog: http://jacek.cz/blog/ On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 13:37 -0400, Joel Farrell wrote: > Jacek, > > As for your item 6, I have checked in the initial editors' copy into CVS. > This version takes the WSDL-S spec and removes preconditions and effects, > and a lot of extraneous information not applicable to a W3C spec. It also > follows the organization and style for a recommendation track document. I > believe this is what we agreed that I should do in the extension to last > week's WG call. There is more that probably should be removed, but I > thought it better to wait until after the call. > > > ---------------------------------------- > > 6. Document status > > - When will we have the first editors' draft? > > - Log of substantial changes after first draft, at the end of document > > - When, who, what > > - Will be removed at Proposed Rec > > -- Joel Farrell >
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 18:24:20 UTC