- From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:49:58 -0400
- To: Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>
- Cc: "public-ws-semann-comments@w3.org" <public-ws-semann-comments@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:03:00AM -0400, Ken Laskey wrote: > > <lifecycleStatus>conceptual</lifecycleStatus> > > but I don't have an immediate way to tell someone what the semantic > model is that describes "conceptual". I can't add conceptual as an > enumeration value in the lifecycle semantic model because not everyone > will have a "conceptual" as a prescribed value and there will be lots > of other values defined over time. I certainly don't want to revise > the lifecycle semantic model every time there is a new status > proposed. That is where we are now and it is neither scalable nor > maintainable. > What I would like to have is a semantic model of each set of lifecycle > values and then be able to create a mapping between them, and my guess > is the lifecycleStatus semantic model would help me create the mapping. Hi Ken, What about <lifecycleStatus>http://my.example.org/ontologies/foo/bar#conceptual</lifecycleStatus> ?
Received on Saturday, 14 March 2009 10:56:19 UTC