RE: WS-RA 2011-05-24

Ø  How can we test to assure ourselves that a mismatch between wsa:action and envelope name will cause no harm (per formal objection)

While the possibility of encountering this interoperation problem in the real world exists (particularly when implementations choose to do dispatch using first child element), I don't think it is serious enough at this time to have to do any additional / negative testing (such as construction of artificial test clients) to check for this case.

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bob Freund
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 11:18 AM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: WS-RA 2011-05-24

distributed meeting

Dial-in and IRC according to usual practice[5]

Topic: Opening
Roll
Assignment of scribe[1]
Approval of this Agenda

Topic: New Issues
-Issue-12722 Eventing: typo- extra @name in wsdl http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12722 -Davis
Topic: Primers (like/unlike)

Topic: Director's CR call
How can we test to assure ourselves that a mismatch between wsa:action and envelope name will cause no harm (per formal objection)

Topic: Test Status

Topic: Memorializing test results for posterity

Topic: Advancement to PR schedule

===


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/chair-tools/scribelist.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/11/03/2011-03-01.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/wiki/Main_Page
[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/tracker/actions/open
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/admin.html