RE: MOAP is checked

1a is now done.
1b should happen automagically, right Yves?
the rest should be discussed by the WG.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
03/15/2010 07:18 PM

To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Subject
RE: MOAP is checked






In preparation for the Last Call review approval meeting tomorrow, I 
suggest some minor edits to the editor?s drafts:
 
1.       All WS-RA specifications
a.       Copyright needs to be updated to 2010.
b.      When Last Call drafts are published, the cross references between 
the various WS-RA specifications should refer to the respective Last Call 
draft of the appropriate WS-RA specification.
c.       Health warning
1.       The WS-RA specifications currently use the health warning: ?Note: 
The use of nested policy assertions as shown here is subject to change as 
it is being currently discussed in the WG?. I suggest changing the warning 
text to: ?Note: The WS-RA WG is interested in Last Call feedback on the 
use of nested policy expressions?.
2.       WS-Enumeration [Appendix C] and WS-Eventing [Appendix E]
a.       This contains a health warning: ?Note: this is a work in progress 
and may change before long?. I suggest changing the warning text to:  ?
Note: The WS-RA WG is interested in Last Call feedback on the action 
tables?.
 
Thanks.
 
From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 
[mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:44 PM
To: Ram Jeyaraman
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: RE: MOAP is checked
 

Done 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. 


Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> 
03/11/2010 06:19 PM 


To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
cc
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: MOAP is checked
 








Hi Doug, 
  
Thanks for the update. 
  
I have one comment. The health warning [1] about the use of nested policy 
assertions needs to be applied to other policy assertions as well: 
EventSource, SubscriptionManager, TransferResourceAssertion, 
TransferResourceFactoryAssertion, DataSource, and FragmentAssertion. 
  
[1] 
  
/mex:MetadataExchange/xs:any 
This extensibility point allows for additional WS-MetadataExchange 
specific metadata to be included within the policy assertion - e.g. 
WS-MetadataExchange WSDL, or nested policy assertions related to the 
WS-MetadataExchange message exchanges. Any metadata that appears is scoped 
to the operations and features of the WS-MetadataExchange specification. 
Note: The use of nested policy assertions as shown here is subject to 
change as it is being currently discussed in the WG. 
  
  
From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 
[mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 9:42 PM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: MOAP is checked 
  

I've made all of the updates for MOAP.  Please look them over to make sure 
I didn't miss anything. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.