Re: resolution of 11189

Hi Doug
Yes I agree, it was an oversight to lose this sentence.  Thanks for 
catching this.
Katy




From:   Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
To:     public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Date:   15/12/2010 00:31
Subject:        resolution of 11189
Sent by:        public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org




Please look over the edits for 11189 - I noticed that the proposal removed 
this line: 
        If the specified content form is not available, or not known, then 
the response MUST include zero MetadataSections of the specified form for 
this QName/Identifier pair. 
I think we need a statement like this for both uses of the @Content 
attribute - so I added it.  Please let me know if you think those edits 
don't seem right. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU