- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:59:11 -0400
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC3C35701.5E63C211-ON85257714.0062C5F5-85257714.0062D36B@us.ibm.com>
Not hearing any objection - it is done.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
04/27/2010 08:33 AM
To
public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
cc
Subject
8832 - repeating text
While adding the resolution of 8832 to wseventing I noticed that we now
repeat ourselves. In section 4 we now say:
When processing a Renew, GetStatus or Unsubscribe operation, a
Subscription Manager MUST generate
an wse:UnknownSubscription fault if it determines that the
subscription is invalid.
We also say this same thing in Renew, GetStatus and Unsubscribe:
If the request message reaches a conformant implementation of
WS-Eventing and the message refers to
an unknown subscription, then the implemention MUST generate a
wse:UnknownSubscription fault.
Seems a bit redundant. Is there any objection to removing duplicate text
from Renew, GetStatus and Unsubscribe as an editorial task?
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:59:40 UTC