- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
- cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> Just went to look at issue 7911 in the issues list and found a whole
> discussion thread in the comments section. I might have missed the entire
> thing if I didn't happen to stumble upon it. Could people please constrain
> themselves to discussing issues on the mailing list and use the comments
> section for major developments (i.e. new proposals, directional resolutions,
> etc.)?
You are entirely right, I should have moved discussion here...
Here is my proposal for resolving that issue:
In 3, before the definition of the different resource operations:
"If the [Body] first child is not matching the
[Action] parameter for any defined Resource Operation, the recipient MUST
generate a ActionAndWrapperMismatch fault"
and add the fault:
<<
5.4 ActionAndWrapperMismatch
This fault is generated if the [Body] first child is not matching the
[Action]
[Code] s:Sender
[Subcode] wst:ActionAndWrapperMismatch
[Reason] Action and Wrapper mismatch
[Detail] none
>>
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Monday, 26 October 2009 13:15:32 UTC