- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:48:30 -0500
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF88F75CED.299EFE8B-ON85257558.0009E929-85257558.0009F693@us.ibm.com>
Resending since the html doesn't show up in the archives.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
__________________
With no more chatter on this one... here's my proposal:
Define the absence of a Dialect to mean the MEX dialect - something like:
[Body]/mex:GetMetadata/mex:Dialect
When this element is present, the response MUST include only
Metadata Sections with the indicated dialect; if the receiver does not
have any Metadata Sections of the indicated dialect, the response MUST
include zero Metadata Sections. When this element is not present, the
implied value is the MEX dialect.
<delete> there is no implied value and so the response may include
Metadata Sections with any dialect. </delete>
And define the MEX dialect - add the following after the above text:
[Body]/mex:GetMetadata/mex:Dialect="http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-mex"
Barring some additional constraints, not defined by this
specification, specifying the MEX dialect in a GetMetadata request message
means that the service SHOULD return all available metadata formats that
this client is allowed to retrieve.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
01/29/2009 10:11 PM
To
Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>
cc
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>,
public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
Subject
Re: Issue 6404 - use of "whatever"
Along those line, it would seem that saying something like "barring some
negotiation, the absence of a Dialect value is equivalent tousing the MEX
dialect". Gives the freedom for someone to profile it later - but
otherwise we make sure "null" is well defined.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
01/29/2009 09:06 PM
To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc
Subject
Issue 6404 - use of "whatever"
This issue is about defining the MEX dialect and defining what gets
returned.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
In particular, I was asked to provide an example of why it might be
useful, in the case where no dialect is specified in the GetMetadata
request, for the service itself to be able to decide what it would return
(the so-called ?whatever? case). The other option would be for this case
to return all MEX sections.
The best example I can provide for the ?whatever? case is this:
If the MEX specification gets ?profiled? for a specific purpose, it would
be very useful to allow the profile to be able to specify what metadata is
to be returned in this default case (especially the non-MEX defined
metadata sections). If you do not do this then each profile would have to
define some separate dialect to mean ?give me all the metadata within my
profile?. Thus the default case gives you an over-loadable definition of
?all? or perhaps ?normal?, which can include non-MEX defined sections.
In a typical profiled case:
Nothing = ?return all metadata within my profile?
MEX = ?return all MEX dialects?
If it is not a profiled implementation, the spec could be recommend that
the implementation return:
Nothing = MEX = ?return all MEX dialects?
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 01:49:08 UTC