- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:27:21 -0500 (EST)
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Doug Davis wrote:
> Bob,
> as I was doing the edits we talked about on yesterday's call I paused on
> adding the reference to the member submission to the bibliography section.
> As I was adding it I couldn't figure out what it would mean to a new
> reader of the spec. Are we promoting it and asking people to use it for
> some purpose? I'm worried that it will be confusing and send the wrong
> message. I checked our favorite examples (WSA and WSPolicy) and neither
> of those include these kinds of references. If we want to have a trail
> that leads back to the member submissions then I think putting it in the
> "previous version" link would be more appropriate. Then people can follow
> our versions thru history and eventually end up at the member submission.
SOAP did link informatively to SOAP 1.1 [1], "previous version" links are
only for W3C produced documents, so the member submission won't qualify
for that.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#nonnormrefs
> Anyway, I'd like to discuss this further on next week's call.
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 13:27:32 UTC