Ø Is it fair to assume that the act of generating a fault will halt the processing of the request in who's context the fault was generated? Yes, readers familiar with general fault semantics would conclude that the corresponding request failed when a fault is generated. From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:gilbert.pilz@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:42 PM To: Ram Jeyaraman Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org Subject: Re: 8283 discussion Do we need to say anything about what effect generating a fault has on the processing of requests? Is it fair to assume that the act of generating a fault will halt the processing of the request in who's context the fault was generated? - gp On 12/15/2009 10:46 AM, Ram Jeyaraman wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283 Pursuant to the action I took from last meeting, I suggest adding a definition [1] of what "generate" means in the context of faults. Thus, to resolve this issue, I suggest: Include changes to fault definitions as proposed in the issue. Add [1] to the compliance section. Thanks. [1] Add to the compliance section of all WS-RA specifications The term "generate" in used relation to the various faults defined by this specification. This term implies that a fault is produced but does not necessarily imply that it is transmitted.
Received on Thursday, 31 December 2009 23:46:50 UTC