Do we need to say anything about what effect generating a fault has on
the processing of requests? Is it fair to assume that the act of
generating a fault will halt the processing of the request in who's
context the fault was generated?
- gp
On 12/15/2009 10:46 AM, Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
>
>
>
> Pursuant to the action I took from last meeting, I suggest adding a
> definition [1] of what "generate" means in the context of faults.
>
>
>
> Thus, to resolve this issue, I suggest:
>
> 1. Include changes to fault definitions as proposed in the issue.
>
> 2. Add [1] to the compliance section.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> [1] Add to the compliance section of all WS-RA specifications
>
>
>
> The term "generate" in used relation to the various faults defined by
> this specification. This term implies that a fault is produced but
> does not necessarily imply that it is transmitted.
>