Re: [issue 6432] - a modest proposal

LOL  I don't disagree about EPRs - but like it or not WSA is done, out 
there and we're stuck with it. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> 
04/14/2009 03:41 PM

To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject
Re: [issue 6432] - a modest proposal






On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Doug Davis wrote:

> I wouldn't describe the situation the same way.  I don't believe the 
> proposal suggests that people keep 'A' - rather it simply offers it as 
> an option for those who do not wish to change their code.  If I were 
> starting from scratch with my implementation I would much prefer to have 

> a single way of expressing how/where to send messages, not two. That's 
> the more interoperable solution.

Yes, clearly having one way of doing thing is a better recipe for interop, 

hence my question :)

> As for "keeping A" - let's not forget that "A" is broken. People are 
> free to continue to use it as they do today, as long as they understand 
> the limitations. But WS-E itself should promote a solution that isn't 
> broken and is consistent with the rest of the WS-* stack.

Well, to me, anything using EPRs is broken ;) brokenness is relative.

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves