- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 03:53:55 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- cc: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Jeff Mischkinsky wrote:
> hi,
> My understanding of the use of "opaque" wrt to URI's is that you are not
> supposed to infer anything from the structure of the URI, not that specific
> uri's don't have specific "meanings"/semantics as defined in specs.
That's exactly what I said :)
<<
Well, they are different, but unless you know WS-Addressing, or unless you
resolve http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous and find out the
relationship between this URI and the WS-Addressing spec.
>>
If the app implement ws-addr, then it knows the semantic of that URI, and
the fact that that URI is supposed to have a stable meaning (unlike most
endpoints).
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 07:54:04 UTC