- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:04:01 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6533 --- Comment #8 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> 2009-09-03 00:04:01 --- > Yves, > For the one operation in each spec that has been deemed 'safe', I was > thinking of just adding this text after the definition of the operation: > > This operation will not result in any side effect imputable to the > requester. This means that in case of an underlying protocol error that > might get unnoticed, resending the same request can be done automatically. > > Does this work for you? Yes, with a minor modification, can we say "This operation is safe; It will not result in..." ? (ie: I'd like to keep the 'safe' in the text somewhere) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 00:04:15 UTC