- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:13:47 +0000
- To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8179
Summary: All: refs to faults
Product: WS-Resource Access
Version: FPWD
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: All
AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
ReportedBy: dug@us.ibm.com
QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
In most specs when we refer to faults we say something like:
...generate a wsxx:FooBar fault.
However, in some cases we say:
...generate a FooBar fault.
(notice the missing namespace/prefix qualifier).
Proposal:
for consistency we should go thru all specs and add the appropriate
prefix to each reference.
Once example from Transfer:
then the service MUST generate an UnknownDialect fault.
would become:
then the service MUST generate an wst:UnknownDialect fault.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 17:13:56 UTC