Yes, that's correct.
CC: WSMAN WG
From: Bob Freund [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:14 PM
To: Josh Cohen
Cc: 'Gilbert Pilz' (gilbert.pilz@oracle.com); Tom Rutt; public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: WS-Management Issue Resolution
Josh,
Does that mean that this email was the response indicating satisfaction to the resolutions of 9607, 9608, 9611, and 9612?
thanks
-bob
On May 26, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Josh Cohen wrote:
See below
From: Bob Freund [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 5:40 PM
To: Josh Cohen
Cc: 'Gilbert Pilz' (gilbert.pilz@oracle.com<mailto:gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>); Tom Rutt
Subject: Re: WS-Management Issue Resolution
Josh,
[JoshCo] I don't understand what you are asking for here.
I don't see anything on 9607, 9608, 9611 or 9612
[JoshCo] WSRA resolved these as WONT. We're accepting that.
I see "preliminary responses" on 9609 and 9610,
I have seen nothing yet on 9613
[JoshCo] these are forthcoming from WSMAN as discussed on todays call.
Thanks
-bob
On May 26, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Josh Cohen wrote:
Can one of you ack that this made it to the list?
From: Josh Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 4:34 PM
To: 'public-ws-resource-access@w3.org<mailto:'public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>'
Subject: WS-Management Issue Resolution
Hi,
This message is sent on behalf of the WS-Management WG in DMTF. The WG wishes further discussion on these issues:
* 9609 - Enumeration optimization
* 9610 - Heartbeats
* 9613 - Persistent subscriptions
The group accepts the WSRA proposed resolution on the following issues:
* 9607 - RequestEPR
* 9608 - Enumeration count
* 9611 - Batched events
* 9612 - Xpath Level 2 dialect
Thanks
---
10 PRINT "JOSH COHEN - MICROSOFT CORPORATION"
30 GOTO 10; RUN