Re: WS-Management Issue Resolution

Josh,
Does that mean that this email was the response indicating satisfaction to the resolutions of 9607, 9608, 9611, and 9612?
thanks
-bob

On May 26, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Josh Cohen wrote:

> See below
>  
>  
> From: Bob Freund [mailto:bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 5:40 PM
> To: Josh Cohen
> Cc: 'Gilbert Pilz' (gilbert.pilz@oracle.com); Tom Rutt
> Subject: Re: WS-Management Issue Resolution
>  
> Josh,
> [JoshCo] I don’t understand what you are asking for here.
> I don't see anything on 9607, 9608, 9611 or 9612
>  
> [JoshCo] WSRA resolved these as WONT.  We’re accepting that.
>  
> I see "preliminary responses" on 9609 and 9610,
> I have seen nothing yet on 9613
> [JoshCo] these are forthcoming from WSMAN as discussed on todays call.
> Thanks
> -bob
>  
> On May 26, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Josh Cohen wrote:
> 
> 
> Can one of you ack that this made it to the list?
>  
>  
> From: Josh Cohen 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 4:34 PM
> To: 'public-ws-resource-access@w3.org'
> Subject: WS-Management Issue Resolution
>  
> Hi,
>  
> This message is sent on behalf of the WS-Management WG in DMTF.   The WG wishes further discussion on these issues:
>  
> ·       9609 – Enumeration optimization
> ·       9610 – Heartbeats
> ·       9613 – Persistent subscriptions
>  
> The group accepts the WSRA proposed resolution on the following issues:
> ·       9607 – RequestEPR
> ·       9608 – Enumeration count
> ·       9611 – Batched events
> ·       9612 – Xpath Level 2 dialect
>  
> Thanks
>  
> ---
> 10 PRINT "JOSH COHEN - MICROSOFT CORPORATION"
> 30 GOTO 10; RUN
>  
>