RE: New Issue: 5188 Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer

Thank you for looking into this.

>I would prefer to see the 2nd example use
>a new namespace name and retain the example.

That sounds fine. I request you to prepare a namespace prefix and any required adjustments to the supporting text.

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:02 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Issue: 5188 Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer

I agree that the examples incorrectly suggest using an extension in the
policy namespace.

I agree with removing the first example.

I would prefer to see the 2nd example use a new namespace name and
retain the example.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 7:33 PM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: New Issue: 5188 Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer
>
> Title: Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer
>
> Description:
>
> We found two incorrect examples in Section 4 (see the
> attached HTML document).
>
> Justification: incorrect examples.
>
> Target: Primer.
>
> Proposal: drop them.
>
> Regards,
>
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
>