- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:14:58 -0700
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- CC: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Thank you for looking into this. >I would prefer to see the 2nd example use >a new namespace name and retain the example. That sounds fine. I request you to prepare a namespace prefix and any required adjustments to the supporting text. Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:02 PM To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: RE: New Issue: 5188 Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer I agree that the examples incorrectly suggest using an extension in the policy namespace. I agree with removing the first example. I would prefer to see the 2nd example use a new namespace name and retain the example. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 7:33 PM > To: public-ws-policy@w3.org > Subject: New Issue: 5188 Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer > > Title: Incorrect Examples in Section 4 - Primer > > Description: > > We found two incorrect examples in Section 4 (see the > attached HTML document). > > Justification: incorrect examples. > > Target: Primer. > > Proposal: drop them. > > Regards, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > Microsoft Corporation >
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 23:15:15 UTC