Re: Ignorable assertions and interoperability

Thanks Umit... I think my concerns have been mostly addressed as part of today's discussion in this thread. 
Cheers, Sergey

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Yalcinalp, Umit 
  To: Sergey Beryozkin ; public-ws-policy@w3.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:26 PM
  Subject: RE: Ignorable assertions and interoperability


  The more accurate wording is that the ignorable assertions are not designed to introduce wire level artifacts, rather than interoperability. 

  Would that address your concern? 




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sergey Beryozkin
    Sent: Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 2:52 AM
    To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
    Subject: Ignorable assertions and interoperability


    Hi

    During the latest concall it was recommended to advise not to use ignorable assertions if the interoperability would be affected...I thought it was a strong statement at a time. 
    The reason for that was that I was assuming at a time a WS-Policy level interoperability was referred to.
    Most of the time it's obvious what interoperability the spec/primer texts refer to, but I feel it would be useful to revisit (in the primer and guidelines) all references to the 'interoperability' terms and qualify them as appropriate...

    Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin