RE: Ignorable assertions and interoperability

The more accurate wording is that the ignorable assertions are not
designed to introduce wire level artifacts, rather than
interoperability. 
 
Would that address your concern? 
 


________________________________

	From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sergey Beryozkin
	Sent: Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 2:52 AM
	To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
	Subject: Ignorable assertions and interoperability
	
	
	Hi
	 
	During the latest concall it was recommended to advise not to
use ignorable assertions if the interoperability would be affected...I
thought it was a strong statement at a time. 
	The reason for that was that I was assuming at a time a
WS-Policy level interoperability was referred to.
	Most of the time it's obvious what interoperability the
spec/primer texts refer to, but I feel it would be useful to revisit (in
the primer and guidelines) all references to the 'interoperability'
terms and qualify them as appropriate...
	 
	Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin