RE: Update media type description (proposal to relate this to issue 4042)

+1

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 02/07/2007 08:39:13 AM:

> 
> Actually I would prefer to have a separate issue so that it easier 
> to track individual changes.  In my experience "morphing" issues is 
> not a good idea.
> 
> I believe we should deal with this item under agenda item 7.c) on 
> today's agenda.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> > Sent: February 6, 2007 9:13 PM
> > To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > Subject: Update media type description (proposal to relate this to 
issue
> > 4042)
> >
> >
> > There needs to be a change made to Appendix A. "wspolicy+xml media 
type"
> > of the framework document, see
> > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-
> > framework.html#media-type
> >
> > According to http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype , as part
> > of the preparation of moving out of Last Call (to W3C Candidate
> > Recommendation or beyond), we need to do the following:
> >
> > "Change the introduction to the registration information to say that 
it
> > is being submitted to the IESG for review, approval, and registration
> > with IANA."
> >
> > I would propose to reopen issue
> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4042 and make this 
change,
> > and rename the issue from "Editorial fix to Media type description" to
> > "changes of Media type description". We can use the same issue for all
> > changes to the description (you will see at
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype that there is at least
> > one more change for CR>PR).
> >
> > Regards, Felix.
> 
>