- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:07:02 -0400
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7BBE9220.1BBD51B1-ON852572BA.005DD633-852572BA.005DFDA4@us.ibm.com>
I decided to draft up a possible solution for this issue - add a new section 7 as follows: - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7. Negative Testcases As part of this round of testing a set of WS-Policy expressions will be provided. Each one will be invalid in some way. Implementations will be expected to attempt to Normalize each expression and detect that there is an error. It is beyond the scope of this document to define what action each implementation needs to take, however, a successful result will be considered to be achieved if some kind of corrective action is taken. Some possible actions might include: generation of a fault or attempting to fix the expression so it is no longer invalid. - - - - - - - - - - - - - thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 04/11/2007 11:53 AM To "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org> cc Subject NEW ISSUE: Round4 negative tests The round4 doc [1] mentions negative tests but doesn't actually says what's involved. We can assume that we're supposed to try to Normalize the xml files and that the engine MUST (should?) fail in some way - but it would be nice if the doc stated this so that everyone knows what "success" means. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/interop/WS-Policy-Scenarios-Round4.doc?only_with_tag=Release-1-20070322 thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 17:07:13 UTC