- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:40:01 -0800
- To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Maryann Hondo" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Paul, You made a point about the RM Policy below for Section 5.1. The specification that we used is [1]. In this document, there are indeed 3 assertions defined, one for WSRM itself the other 2 wrt securing the sequence. I am wondering whether you had the previous version of the RM spec in mind, but that is not what is used. Thanks. --umit [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200608/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-04.pdf > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, Oct 20, 2006 3:15 PM > To: Yalcinalp, Umit; Maryann Hondo > Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org > Subject: RE: Guidelines Document > > Initial set of editorial comments: > > 1. Section 5.5 Comparison of Nested and Parametrized Assertions > > Change "Parametrized" to "Parameterized" in section title in > TOC and later in the document. > > 2. Section 1. Introduction > > " WS-Policy Assertions are xml expressions" > > Change "xml" to "XML". > > 3. Abstract > > " Web Services Policy 1.5 - Guidelines for Policy Assertion > Authors is a guideline for assertion authors that will work > with the Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework and Web Services > Policy 1.5 - Attachment specifications to create domain > specific assertions." > > Add pointers to references for "Web Service Policy 1.5 - > Framework" and "Web Services Policy 1.5. Attachment" since > this is the first time they are referenced. > > Do this for other documents referenced in the document as well. > > 4. Section 1. Introduction > > "B. XML Namespaces lists all the that are used in this > document. (XML elements without a namespace prefix are from > the Web Services Policy XML Namespace.)" > > Change "all the that" to "all the namespace prefixes that". > > 5. Section 2.1.1 > > "An example of a domain specification" > > Change "specification" to "specification". > > 6. Section 2.1.1 > > " The WS-Security authors have defined their scope as follows" > > Change "WS-Security" to "WS-SecurityPolicy". > > 7. Section 2.1.3 > > " WS-PolicyFramework and WS-PolicyAssertions specifications." > > I think this is trying to refer to the Framework and > Attachment specification. If so then change this to: > > "WS-Policy Framework and WS-Policy Attachment specifications." > > 8. Section 2.1.3 > > " that can reflect its on the wire message behavior" > > Change "its" to "it's". > > 9. Section 2.1 3 > > " Whe deploying services with policies it is useful" > > Change to: > > "When deploying services with policies it is useful". > > 10. Section 3.1 > > " A referencing mechanism is very useful in a tooling > environment or when creating a domain specific attachment in > multiple WSDL files, EPRs, in which the same set of policies > are expected to be applied." > > "EPRs" should be defined and a reference provided. > > Change "in multiple WSDL files, EPRs" to " in multiple WSDL > files or EPRs". > > 11. Section 4 > > "is marked as optional using the @optionalattribute" > > There is a missing space between "@optional" and "attribute". > > 12. Section 5.1 > > "New aurthors are encouraged to look at Web Services Reliable > Messaging Policy to see an example of a relatively simple > domain that has defined 3 assertions." > > Change "aurthors" to "authors". > > I don't believe this reference actually defines 3 assertions > any longer. Please check. > > 13. Section 5.2 > > " it is important to identify whether or not the domain is > self containted" > > Change "self contaited" to "self-contained". > > 14. Section 5.2 > > " will also need to have community supportin implementation" > > Fix "supporting". > > 15. Section 5.3 > > "thesp:TransportBinding policy assertion" > > Missing space after "the". > > 16. Section 5.3 > > " The sp:AlgorithmSuite is a nested policy assertion of > thesp:TransportBinding policy assertion. Thesp:AlgorithmSuite > assertion requires" > > Missing space before "sp:" (two occurrences). > > 17. Section 5.6 > > " it should be incorporated into the assertion design or in > the message iteself" > > Change "itself" to "itself". > > 18 Section 5.7 > > " in order to engage behaviors must not be forgotton" > > Change "forgotton" to "forgotten". > > 19. Section 5.10 > > " Howeever, this approach only" > > Change "Howeever" to "However". > > 20. Section 5.11.1 > > "It also promotes managability" > > Change "managability" to "manageability". > > 21. Section 8 > > " how a fictitous company might utilize the WS-Policy Framework" > > Change "fictitous" to "fictitious". > > 22. Example 8.1 > > "<wss:Security sopap:mustUnderstand ="1">" > > Change "sopap:" to "soap:". > > 23. Example 8.2 > > "<sp:TransportBinding>lt;/spTransportBinding> > > Fix missing "<". > > 24. Section 8 > > " The sp:TransportBinding element is a policy assertion.The" > > Add two spaces at end of sentence and before "The". > > 25. Section 8 > > " The first policy is shown in Figure X," > > Fix the bad reference to Figure X. There are other bad > references to Figure Y. > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com > > > > ________________________________________ > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit > Sent: October 19, 2006 7:58 PM > To: public-ws-policy@w3.org > Subject: Guidelines Document > > All, > Please find the first version of the guidelines document in > [1] and send comments/issues. > Frederick, would you verify the comments you have raised has > been adressed to your satisfaction. > Regards, > --umit > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-g > uidelines.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > ---------------------- > Dr. Umit Yalcinalp > Architect > NetWeaver Industry Standards > SAP Labs, LLC > Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095 > SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238 >
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 01:40:56 UTC