W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:42:16 -0400
To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Cc: Paul Cotton <paul.cotton@microsoft.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org, Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, Bob Freund-Hitachi <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Message-id: <DA0C0448-53ED-4E53-BEDC-D293A9059EA5@Sun.COM>
Its not entirely clear to me what the referenced text means, I could  
read it in one of two ways:

(i) The policy embedded in the EPR is replaced by the attached policy
(ii) The attached policy is somehow merged with the policy embedded  
in the EPR - i.e. the policy embedded in the EPR isn't in-scope wrt  
the policy attachment mechanisn but it is in-scope wrt WS-Addr  

Option (i) looks simpler but it seems to contradict WS-Addr which  
says: "A reference may contain metadata that describes the behavior,  
policies and capabilities of the endpoint."

It would be good for the WS-Policy spec to be 100% explicit about  
this point.


On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Asir Vedamuthu wrote:

> The example in Section 3.4 WS-PolicyAttachment [1] is illustrative. It
> illustrates an extensibility point in the external policy attachment.
>> if the EPR contains a metadata element with an
>> embedded wsp:Policy (either directly or via an
>> intermediate embedded or referenced WSDL),
>> how are the policies reconciled?"
> Here is what I see in the draft on this question:
> "For the purposes of attaching policy to a policy subject through this
> mechanism, any policy expression contained inside of the wsp:AppliesTo
> element MUST NOT be considered in scope. For example, an Endpoint
> Reference may be used as a domain expression, and it may contain  
> policy
> expressions within it, but this policy expressions are not  
> considered in
> scope with respect to the wsp:PolicyAttachment element using it."
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy- 
> attachment.
> html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#ExternalPolicyAttachment
> I hope this helps.
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:52 PM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Cc: Maryann Hondo; Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM; Bob Freund-Hitachi
> Subject: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG
> Add an issue on coordination with other working groups
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619
> Maryann carried out her action to ask the WS-Addressing WG to  
> review the
> example in Section 3.4 of WS-PolicyAttachments:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/ 
> 0087.ht
> ml
> We need to consider the questions asked by Marc Hadley in his response
> to Maryann's request:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/ 
> 0089.ht
> ml
> "Have you considered the semantics when other things are included in
> the EndpointReference. In particular, if the EPR contains a metadata
> element with an embedded wsp:Policy (either directly or via an
> intermediate embedded or referenced WSDL), how are the policies
> reconciled?"
> WG members are encouraged to reply to this thread to help the WG to
> reach consensus on how to reply to Marc's question.
> /paulc
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com

Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 16:42:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:14 UTC