W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Proposed change to Framework 3.1

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:35:43 -0400
Message-Id: <5940B11E-3C98-4996-9886-CAAFD71B1BBB@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
To: ext Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>

This is what this sentence says, that you need to tell parameters and  
assertions apart, exactly for that reason, and that how it is done is  
by putting nested assertions within wsp elements as described in the  
proposed text.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Aug 21, 2006, at 3:11 PM, ext Anthony Nadalin wrote:

> >Use of a policy framework element to contain a nested assertion  
> enables nested assertions to be distinguished from assertion  
> parameters and processed appropriately
>
> The major difference between using assertion parameter and a nested  
> assertion is the intersection ability, the above sentence does not  
> make sense
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
> <graycol.gif>
> Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
>
>
> Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
> Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
> 08/21/2006 12:01 PM
>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> To
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> public-ws-policy@w3.org
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> cc
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Subject
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Proposed change to Framework 3.1
> <ecblank.gif>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> I propose the following change to 3.1, "Policy Assertion" in the
> latest editor's draft of the policy framework [1]. The change is
> shown as a red-line to 3.1, in the attached PDF.
>
> This is proposed as a partial resolution to bug report 3549 [2] and
> as a replacement to previous proposals regarding text to clarify the
> framework with regards to this issue.
>
> I propose the issue with regards to the normalization procedure in
> 4.2 (as also noted in the bug report) should be made a separate
> issue. This normalization procedure does not appear to explicitly
> pass through parameters.
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
> [1] <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-
> framework.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8>
>
> [2] <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549>
>
> [attachment "policy-framework-3549-proposal.pdf" deleted by Anthony  
> Nadalin/Austin/IBM]
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 19:36:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:13 UTC