- From: Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:11:36 -0500
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFF66877BD.4C6145EA-ON862571D1.0069368C-862571D1.00696EF0@us.ibm.com>
>Use of a policy framework element to contain a nested assertion enables
nested assertions to be distinguished from assertion parameters and
processed appropriately
The major difference between using assertion parameter and a nested
assertion is the intersection ability, the above sentence does not make
sense
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Frederick Hirsch
<frederick.hirsch
@nokia.com> To
Sent by: public-ws-policy@w3.org
public-ws-policy- cc
request@w3.org Hirsch Frederick
<frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Subject
08/21/2006 12:01 Proposed change to Framework 3.1
PM
I propose the following change to 3.1, "Policy Assertion" in the
latest editor's draft of the policy framework [1]. The change is
shown as a red-line to 3.1, in the attached PDF.
This is proposed as a partial resolution to bug report 3549 [2] and
as a replacement to previous proposals regarding text to clarify the
framework with regards to this issue.
I propose the issue with regards to the normalization procedure in
4.2 (as also noted in the bug report) should be made a separate
issue. This normalization procedure does not appear to explicitly
pass through parameters.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
[1] <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-
framework.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3549>
[attachment "policy-framework-3549-proposal.pdf" deleted by Anthony
Nadalin/Austin/IBM]
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic28670.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 19:23:56 UTC