- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 17:06:29 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <497B3BF095D687408EC268A103E85E8575BF4E@ca-exbe1.webm.webmethods.com>
Sorry, that should have been a1), a3) and a4). ________________________________ From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad Yendluri Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 5:03 PM To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: RE: Guidelines Doc Review - By Prasad and Asir Hi, I forgot to send a follow-up email on this but, I finished a10, a2) and a3) on Friday. I also updated Appendix E (Major changes since last revision). Regards, Prasad ________________________________ From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 11:05 AM To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Cc: Prasad Yendluri Subject: RE: Guidelines Doc Review - By Prasad and Asir Fixed a5) and a6). Added editors' note in Section 5.8 - To be re-structured to use the format in the Architecture of the WWW doc. Added editors' note in Section 5.5 - Looks incomplete - carries Good Practices but there isn't any explanatory text. Added editors' note in Section 5.1 - May 9th 07, an issue was opened against G2 - issue 4566. Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 4:40 PM To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Cc: Prasad Yendluri Subject: Guidelines Doc Review - By Prasad and Asir Prasad and I reviewed the Guidelines document and discovered a few items. a) The following Good Practices from the IBM and MS contribution are missing in the Guidelines document: 1) G1 - An assertion author should reuse an existing assertion (rather than create a new one) whenever possible. Designated home: 5.3.4 2) G2 - An assertion author should define policy assertions for behaviors that are relevant to compatibility tests, such as web service protocols that manifest on the wire. Open issue: 4556 3) G3 - An assertion author should use a unique QName to identify a distinct behavior. Designated home: 5.3.2 4) G20 - An assertion author should start with a simple working assertion that allows assertion parameter extensibility. Designated home: 5.3.1 5) G21 - An assertion description should clearly specify how the assertion may compose with other related assertions, if any. Designated home: 5.8 6) G22 - An assertion author should not define policy assertions to represent information that is necessary to understand a message. Designated home: 5.3.3 b) Section 5.5 looks incomplete - carries Good Practices but there isn't any explanatory text. Prasad is fixing items a1), a3) and a4). Asir is fixing items a5) and a6). Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 00:06:43 UTC