RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

Please publish.  Monica has some small changes and some larger changes.
I said she should make all her comments against the doc.
 
Cheers,
Dave


________________________________

	From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
	Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:48 PM
	To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
	Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors
draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow
	
	
	Sure.  


________________________________

		From: Prasad Yendluri
[mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
		Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:46 PM
		To: David Orchard; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
		Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer
Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow
		
		

		Well in that case I ask that you send an explicit note
by 3pm tomorrow if all is clear from your side or not. 

		We did not know there was a dependency on Monica on
this.

		 

		
________________________________


		From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] 
		Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:41 PM
		To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
		Subject: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors
draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

		 

		Well, I didn't know there was an issue.  I think it
reasonable to give her a day to clarify before publishing.  I suggest
that you publish as scheduled unless I've heard something that requires
action.

		 

		Cheers,

		Dave

			 

			
________________________________


			From: Prasad Yendluri
[mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
			Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:37 PM
			To: David Orchard; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
			Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors
draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

			My understanding was we were ready to go and I
was trying to do this as the reporter for the next call.

			It seems Asir had the same understanding, after
speaking with you yesterday. Had we known there was 

			an issue we could have saved ourselves some time
on the diff generation and tagging things. 

			 

			I don't know if Monica is reviewing editors'
drafts in flight, when she would send her feedback or 

			 how we will incorporate that directly without
going through the usual process of the WG 

			but, I will not send it out tomorrow. 

			 

			 

			
________________________________


			From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] 
			Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:14 PM
			To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
			Subject: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors
draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

			 

			Fabian and Monica may have a concern about the
new table in 3.8.4.  I've asked for clarification.  We should hold off
until this is is resolved.

			 

			Cheers,

			Dave

				 

				
________________________________


				From:
public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad
Yendluri
				Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:07 PM
				To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
				Subject: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft
& diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

				Folks,

				 

				The next editors' draft of Primer and
the corresponding diff file are ready to be sent to the WG.

				I am sending this to the editors' list
for a sanity check prior to sending this to the WG list. 

				Please find the drafts here:

				 

				[1] Primer at: http://tinyurl.com/2h9hlq


				[2] Primer diff at:
http://tinyurl.com/yu5o4s 

				 

				The diffs account for changes since the
last primer version sent to WG (March 30, '07).

				Please let me know if you find any show
stoppers.

				I plan to send this to the WG tomorrow
after 3pm pacific if I do not hear otherwise.

				 

				Regards,

				Prasad