- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:48:23 -0700
- To: "Prasad Yendluri" <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4260A18CD3F05B469E67BC6C20464EAC0627F0@rcpbex01.amer.bea.com>
Sure. ________________________________ From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:46 PM To: David Orchard; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow Well in that case I ask that you send an explicit note by 3pm tomorrow if all is clear from your side or not. We did not know there was a dependency on Monica on this. ________________________________ From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:41 PM To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow Well, I didn't know there was an issue. I think it reasonable to give her a day to clarify before publishing. I suggest that you publish as scheduled unless I've heard something that requires action. Cheers, Dave ________________________________ From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:37 PM To: David Orchard; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow My understanding was we were ready to go and I was trying to do this as the reporter for the next call. It seems Asir had the same understanding, after speaking with you yesterday. Had we known there was an issue we could have saved ourselves some time on the diff generation and tagging things. I don't know if Monica is reviewing editors' drafts in flight, when she would send her feedback or how we will incorporate that directly without going through the usual process of the WG but, I will not send it out tomorrow. ________________________________ From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:14 PM To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow Fabian and Monica may have a concern about the new table in 3.8.4. I've asked for clarification. We should hold off until this is is resolved. Cheers, Dave ________________________________ From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad Yendluri Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:07 PM To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow Folks, The next editors' draft of Primer and the corresponding diff file are ready to be sent to the WG. I am sending this to the editors' list for a sanity check prior to sending this to the WG list. Please find the drafts here: [1] Primer at: http://tinyurl.com/2h9hlq [2] Primer diff at: http://tinyurl.com/yu5o4s The diffs account for changes since the last primer version sent to WG (March 30, '07). Please let me know if you find any show stoppers. I plan to send this to the WG tomorrow after 3pm pacific if I do not hear otherwise. Regards, Prasad
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 22:48:43 UTC