RE: 1st draft on primer ignorable

Maryann, 
 
I just reviewed the comments you sent. I believe that they are mostly
editorial in improving the content of the proposal as you have the
captured the hallway conversations. I am fine with the revised text, but
I have one suggestion for the last sentence that says 
 
{It is incumbent on Providers  to declare their policies  and the
Ignorable marker allows them to be truthful.}

 

how about the following instead:

 

{It is incumbent of Providers to declare the behaviors that will be
engaged using policies although those behaviors may not exhibit
wirelevel manifestations. The Ignorable marker allows them to be
truthful. 

 

--umit

 


________________________________

	From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Maryann Hondo
	Sent: Monday, Jan 08, 2007 12:39 PM
	To: Frederick Hirsch
	Cc: Hirsch Frederick; WS-Policy Editors W3C;
public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
	Subject: Re: 1st draft on primer ignorable
	
	

	Frederick, 
	I have some comments on the text. 
	Sorry to have been so late in getting them to you and I'm not
sure how 
	much they impact other comments you received.  Sorry for the
delay. 
	Since I wasn't in the hall conversations, I'm not sure if my
understanding matches 
	everyone else's and I'm interested in knowing if I've "got it". 
	Thanks. 
	
	Maryann 
	
	
	
	
	
Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org 

01/05/2007 09:54 AM 

To
WS-Policy Editors W3C <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org> 
cc
Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> 
Subject
1st draft on primer ignorable

	




	Attached is 1st draft on adding ignorable to primer. I think we
can  
	do this simply by adding two new sections as noted.
	
	Please let me know if you think I should add it in today to get
it  
	into the draft for the F2F, or if you have any other suggestion
or  
	comment.
	
	Thanks
	
	regards, Frederick
	
	Frederick Hirsch
	Nokia