- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:16:56 -0800
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, WS-Policy Editors W3C <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
>I believe there may have been some concern at the F2F on this topic No one has expressed this position directly to Chris or me in person and/or in writing. And I think we made it clear at the F2F that working on the Interop Scenarios document was something Chris and I wanted the Editorial team to do. We both confirmed this today at the end of the WG distributed meeting. People who volunteered to be part of the Editorial team have all agreed to work on ALL the documents the Chairs assign to the team. If any Editors feel they cannot meet this kind of obligation then they should talk directly to the Chairs about this. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch > Sent: February 7, 2007 3:06 PM > To: WS-Policy Editors W3C > Cc: Hirsch Frederick > Subject: Scenarios document editor list > > > Today on the editors call we discussed the status of the scenario > document, and whether the current list of active editors should also > be the editors of the scenario document(s). > > I believe there may have been some concern at the F2F on this topic, > so am asking whether all current editors find it acceptable to be > editors of the scenario document. > > Please comment on the editor list. > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:17:15 UTC