- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:01:52 -0700
- To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
Hi Paul and Chris, There was some confusion on today's policy editors call about how the editors are assigned actions that arise as a result of issue resolution. There appear to be 2 approaches in play: 1. The WG assigns an action item to the editors after resolving an issue. This then shows up in the ACTIONS assigned in the WG meeting recor. I think shows up in the WG Ais (or does this go directly to the editors Ais?). 2. The WG does not assign an action item, it just resolves the issue. It is implicit that the editors do the action. Somebody, probabably one of the editors (and this week it was Prasad), creates an action in the editors AIs. So, which approach is the WS-Policy WG doing? I think the first is a bit heavier weight a process as resolving an issue takes 2 entries, though it does have the nice benefit that it is captured in the minutes. Cheers, Dave
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2006 20:02:39 UTC