- From: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:09:13 -0400
- To: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE0E0EEFD.15F3EEB7-ON87257206.00589CDD-85257206.0058BB95@us.ibm.com>
I can if someone lays out the steps needed. It seems this is not as simple as a single change to the XML. So, if you or Felix could articulate the steps, or point me to a document that contains them, then I can execute the steps. Maryann Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com> 10/13/2006 10:17 AM To Maryann Hondo/Austin/IBM@IBMUS cc public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject RE: WS-Policy 1.5 Specs Editors Drafts for Sanity Check Review Hi Maryann, I agree with your comments. Can I request you to make the changes? Thanks, Prasad From: Maryann Hondo [mailto:mhondo@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 6:21 AM To: Prasad Yendluri Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org; public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org Subject: Re: WS-Policy 1.5 Specs Editors Drafts for Sanity Check Review Prasad, Thanks for all your hard work on this. I've given both a quick pass and will print out and review over the weekend with a more detailed reading, but here are two minor changes to the summary text to consider.... I think the phrased is "fleshed-out" but I would recommend replacing this with "added text to". And for the security considerations section, why not just leave out the material in "()"...I don't think it adds anything. I think simple, direct statements are the way to go for a summary. Maryann Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com> Sent by: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org 10/12/2006 04:29 PM To dorchard@bea.com, public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org cc Subject WS-Policy 1.5 Specs Editors Drafts for Sanity Check Review Folks, We have all the work on the Attachment specification completed. Dave: I did the Appendix D (Changes since last WD) also, so that we can start internal review of this document, while we await the last AI on the framework doc to be completed. 1. The Editors Draft of the Attachment document is here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment.html 2. The Corresponding diffs from last WD file is here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment-diff20060927.html If you like, please also review the mostly complete Framework document (we have just one AI pending), so that we can get head start on this document also: 3. The Editors Draft of the Framework document is here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.html 4. The Corresponding diffs from last WD is here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework-diff20060927.html Please review for sanity check to see if we are ready to send this out to the WG. Just sanity check to spot obvious blunders: As an editor please feel free to make any updates you see needed (and let the team know). If there are no major issues, I hope we can send these to the WG COB Monday? Thanks. Prasad
Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 16:09:27 UTC