Re: Proposed telcon agenda, 2/18

Hi Don,
Should we get time on the WSA agenda for the same presentation?

Colleen


Don Mullen wrote:

> Regrets for this upcoming meeting :-( - I am skiing in Park City, Utah with
> my children :-).
>
> > 2. Discuss the document Jean-Jacques posted [1]  (50min)
>
> Looks like a good start.  I am somewhat concerned about how much we can have
> ready to present at the next F2F - two weeks out.  Perhaps a portion of
> tomorrow's meeting could be spent discussing what kind of deliverable we can
> have for that meeting.  I know Jonathan would like to see a resolution on
> features/properties by the end of the F2F, so it seems some kind of
> presentation to the group will be in order.  I think the focus should be on
> the presentation, which means drilling in on the specifics of a couple of
> the more compelling use-cases -- and resisting spending too much time on the
> details of the rest.
>
> As a WSD WG member, I would want to know:
>
> o what are the use cases (we've started this discussion)
>
> o why can't this be solved with the general extension mechanism in WSDL?
>
> o what else might this affect other than WSD?
>
> I would like to volunteer to put time into putting together a presentation
> for the F2F.
>
> > 3. Decide on date/time for next call (5min)
>
> The Tuesday 11am EST is designated as our time slot going forward --
> correct?
>
> Don

Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 12:37:56 UTC