RE: PFTF next telcon

Oy.  I'd really rather not go through that much process, plus my schedule is somewhat variable.  What about some time Friday?  Fridays have worked well in the past.

Have we decided we want a weekly call?  I think I missed that part, and thought we were just scheduling the next one.

--Glen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Mullen [mailto:donmullen@tibco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:56 PM
> To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Agreed.  If everyone on the list who will be participating on 
> the calls
> sends me a private email with the following information:
> 
> 	o Your Timezone
> 	o Availability -- in blocks of time (your timezone)
> 	  listed in order of preference (most preferred to least)
> 
> I will put together a matrix and proposed weekly meeting time 
> (or times).
> Sending individual messages to the list isn't very productive.
> 
> **Please send by end of day today -- Tuesday**  That way, I can post
> tomorrow morning.
> 
> Don
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:06 PM
> To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon
> 
> And not with the xmlp call, which is wednesdays at 11am pst.
> 
> But I hardly think this is ridiculous.  We each have many different
> responsibilities, and each time a group starts, it's crazy 
> finding the best
> time.
> 
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sanjiva
> > Weerawarana
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:34 AM
> > To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> >
> >
> >
> > This is ridiculous- we'll never find a slot that'll make everyone
> > happy. I suggest Jonathan picks a set of viable times (e.g., times
> > that do not overlap with the WS-Desc or WS-Arch calls) and then
> > we rotate amongst those on a weekly basis. Some times will be not
> > great for some. Such is life.
> >
> > Sanjiva.
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:12:31 UTC