- From: Don Mullen <donmullen@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:56:00 -0500
- To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
Agreed. If everyone on the list who will be participating on the calls sends me a private email with the following information: o Your Timezone o Availability -- in blocks of time (your timezone) listed in order of preference (most preferred to least) I will put together a matrix and proposed weekly meeting time (or times). Sending individual messages to the list isn't very productive. **Please send by end of day today -- Tuesday** That way, I can post tomorrow morning. Don -----Original Message----- From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:06 PM To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon And not with the xmlp call, which is wednesdays at 11am pst. But I hardly think this is ridiculous. We each have many different responsibilities, and each time a group starts, it's crazy finding the best time. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sanjiva > Weerawarana > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:34 AM > To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon > > > > This is ridiculous- we'll never find a slot that'll make everyone > happy. I suggest Jonathan picks a set of viable times (e.g., times > that do not overlap with the WS-Desc or WS-Arch calls) and then > we rotate amongst those on a weekly basis. Some times will be not > great for some. Such is life. > > Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:01:31 UTC