RE: PFTF next telcon

Seems Thursday is tight.  How about Wed 11:00 PST instead -- easier for all
time zones?

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: 'Glen Daniels'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon

That doesn't work well for me, as the runs right up to the ws-arch telcon.
I need at least a half hour for lunch.

12:30 EST?

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Glen Daniels
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: 'public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org'
> Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon
>
> 1PM EST works for me.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:34 AM
> > To: Sandeep Kumar
> > Cc: jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr; gdaniels@macromedia.com;
> > youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:03:51 -0800
> > "Sandeep Kumar" <sandkuma@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am
> > PST suitable to
> > > everyone?
> > > That is right after WSD meeting.
> >
> > It would be *really* nice to have some sort of break between
> > meetings.  Half an hour would be enough, but it would really
> > help to be able to stand up and walk around a bit.  So I'm
> > not thrilled by 9:30 (12:30 EST); would prefer 10:00 (1:00
> > EST), half an hour after the end of the WSD meeting.
> >
> > Amy!
> > > - sandeep
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> > > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> > Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM
> > > To: Glen Daniels
> > > Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for
> > > West Costers.
> > >
> > > Jean-Jacques.
> > >
> > > Glen Daniels wrote:
> > > > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest :
> > > >
> > > > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be doing
> work on the
> > > scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going
> > > >
> > > > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can
> > share syntactic
> > > examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon
> > feature, uri
> > > equals quote..." :)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amelia A. Lewis
> > Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> > alewis@tibco.com
> >
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 12:38:29 UTC