- From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@arjuna.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:45:47 +0100
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Cc: <ksankar@cisco.com>, <public-ws-desc-state@w3c.org>, David Snelling <d.snelling@fle.fujitsu.com>, Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>, Paul Watson <Paul.Watson@newcastle.ac.uk>, Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>, Steve Tuecke <tuecke@mcs.anl.gov>
Sanjiva:
>In IDL if one says:
>
> interface foo {
> attribute string x;
> }
>
>That means the generated language interface will have methods getx()
>and setx(.). Thus, IDL does tell you precisely what methods are
>available to access the state.
No. It entirely depends on the IDL to language binding. For example if this
piece of IDL was bound to a C# implementation then it would most likely bind
to a property, not get/set methods (as it would in Java).
Jim
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 06:46:06 UTC