- From: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:27:10 +0100
- To: "'David Snelling'" <d.snelling@fle.fujitsu.com>, <public-ws-desc-state@w3.org>
David: > This of 'static' SD values as class or interface constants. > Their value never changes and is the same for all instances > (or all endpoints implementing that service). It is just like > a static field in a java interface. I think the problem here > is a language one. I didn't like the choice of the word > static for just this reason. I would describe it as a > WSDL_Constant. The other values for mutability are constant > (set by the instance on creation), extendable (I can add more > but not remove them) and mutable (no holds barred). I agree that the word static is unhelpful. I also understand the need for constants in programming languages, but I don't immediately see the need in WSDL (or for that matter in any IDL). Can you suggest an example to clarify it in my mind? Jim
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:27:18 UTC