- From: Amy Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:19:01 -0400
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: dbooth@w3.org, public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org, youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr
Sorry. If WSDL supports more than SOAP (as I believe that it does), then we must support message exchange patterns that they define. We cannot restrict the set of available MEPs at the binding level to only those defined by SOAP, because WSDL supports binding styles other than SOAP. Amy! On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:31:53 +0200 "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> wrote: > I'm lost by the double negative (can't-only). Didn't you mean > something different? > > Jean-Jacques. > > Amy Lewis wrote: > > > We can't mandate SOAP MEPs only at the binding level, if we plan to > > support bindings other than SOAP. Can we? > > > -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 10:38:43 UTC