- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:30:19 +0600
- To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org>
Out of curiosity- does the SOAP request-response MEP also distinguish the cases as indicated below? If so I guess we have to too. If not, if they can live with it why can't we? For example, to me a request-response MEP can be bound to a same channel interaction or a multiple channel interaction. Both are still the same MEP though. Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org> To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:23 AM Subject: Re: agenda for today's MEP call > Sanjiva, > > The patterns we are discussing are merely variations on the same basic > patterns that we have discussed for months. We are discussing these > variations in order to explicitly nail down subtle differences in the ways > these patterns could be defined. For example: > - whether or not a particular message transmission assumes > conservation of messages > > - whether or not the sender/receiver of a message is specified (as > a variable) > - whether or not the message communication is restricted to being > "on the same channel". > > As the mpes-vs-iops[1] document states: "Inclusion in this list does not > imply endorsement or recommendation by this task force or the working group." > > > 1. > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-vs -iops_clean.htm > > At 09:18 PM 6/16/2003 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > >More patterns?? So are we really going to have > 10 patterns? > >IMHO this is going entirely in the wrong direction if we keep > >adding more patterns. I supported the MEP concept but never > >expected we'd be having 10 MEPs in the document. > > > >I'm sorry to say that I can't join this call tonite .. its a > >bit late for me. > > > >Sanjiva. > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org> > >To: <public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org> > >Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:08 PM > >Subject: agenda for today's MEP call > > > > > > > > > > Agenda for today's MEP call (1:00-2:30pm EDT): > > > > > > A. New patterns from Amy? > > > > > > B. The pattern p2 family in meps-vs-iops[1] > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-v s > >-iops_clean.htm > > > > > > -- > > > David Booth > > > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > > > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 10:30:11 UTC